Every product is purpose-built for semiconductors and runs read-first over your ERP, MES, PLM and EDA estate — agents recommend, deterministic engines set the numbers, a named human approves every write.
0purpose-built products
0suites, one decision spine
Weeksto first value — read-first
Cite or abstainevery claim carries evidence
AI never writes to SAP or MES without a gate
Deterministic engines set the numbers
Named-human approval on every action
one substrate · seven suites · 37 dies · one tidy agent
No die on this wafer answers to “that”.
Try or — search covers product names, one-liners and suites.
agent ⬡ checked all 37 dies · twice
Engineering AI
5 products
From design intent to installed capability — without the knowledge tax.
For CTOs, VPs Engineering, fab program directors and design-ops leaders.
Monday 08:00
Reviews dispositioned and clause-cited overnight, every change’s blast radius computed — no answer trapped in a veteran’s head.
One knowledge-graph spine for fab design and construction — every tool linked to its POCs, utilities, standards, documents and decisions, with AI agents on every gate, plus release↔PO↔need-date build alignment. Read-first over your BIM/CDE estate; write-back only via named-engineer approval.
Capabilities
🧠100%-coverage design review, clause-cited (ISO 14644, SEMI S2/S8)🌊Change blast radius: 47 objects traced in 4 min🧩Clash triage: 2,412 hits → 41 root-cause issues📐Generative ballroom & sub-fab routing — weeks → hours📄36,000+ pages of tool specs → structured POC records
Outcomes
2–4 wks → 24–48 hper design-review pass, at 100% coverage
$44M–$365Mprogram value on one $10B fab (est.)
~13–70xROI vs 3-year platform cost (est.)
$50–65Mvalue of one month of earlier ramp
ModeBuild & Schedule Alignment← absorbs Fab Build AI
Extends the same graph to construction: fab-build orders long-lead packages while the design is still moving, and each month of slip carries $30–130M. Live-links engineering release ↔ PO ↔ site-need date per package and turns divergence into ranked, gated recommendations.
🔗Three-way linkage per package: release ↔ PO ↔ need date🚨5 misalignment classes, detected deterministically💰Ranked by $ exposure × critical-path float consumed🧮Bounded resequence what-ifs — “what slips if switchgear moves 3 weeks?”🧾Evidence chain: drawing rev → ECN → PO line → activity
$30–130Mcost of one month of fab-build slip — the wedge
~2 wkscritical-path float recovered per quarter — $25–65M
0writes to P6/SAP/CDE — owners execute, gates approve
Design ops runs at maturity ~2/5 even here: verification eats 60–70% of effort, EDA license spend is a black box, tapeout slips surface late. A telemetry-and-agents layer over your own exhaust — regression logs, coverage, license servers, Jira.
Capabilities
🧪Regression triage: failures clustered, root-caused, bugs drafted📈Coverage analytics + test-plan copilot🔑EDA license optimizer: idle seats and contention priced⏰Tapeout slip early-warning, while still recoverable🔍IP-reuse semantic search that actually finds things
Outcomes
60–70%the verification share of design effort this attacks
Hard dollarsEDA license spend reduced via utilization analytics
Caught earlytapeout slips flagged while recoverable
Hours returnedregression-triage engineer time — direct P&L
Standards and process windows treated as executable, not archival: recipes, SPC limits and operating states checked continuously against the current design and running fab. Simulation becomes governed evidence — every run pinned to its revision, stale results flagged.
Capabilities
📏300+ executable rules: PASS / FAIL / NEEDS-REVIEW, clause-cited🌀Operational-state simulation before certification⚙️Solver orchestration over your CFD, vibration, energy stack⚡ML surrogates answer in seconds, not days♻️Delta re-checks: a change re-triggers only affected checks
Outcomes
Seconds vs dayssurrogate estimates vs full solver runs
1–3x, not 21–78xcost of error discovery, moved left (NASA curve)
Caught at designthe at-rest-pass / operational-fail mode
Thousands of PCN/EOL notices a year, each traced by hand while 90–180-day last-time-buy windows close. Every notice is parsed and resolved against your BOM and qualification graph — blast radius across products, quals, WIP and customers, tuned for recall.
Capabilities
📨Every notice parsed to a typed schema (email, portals, aggregators)🕸️Impact traced: BOM → products → quals → WIP → customers📦Last-time-buy optimizer under demand uncertainty✉️Gated response drafts + re-qualification triggers🔄Your own ECOs trace the same graph outward
Outcomes
Days → minutesimpact analysis per change notice
0last-time-buy windows missed
→ ~0quality escapes from unmanaged change
Thousands/yrnotices absorbed without added headcount
Greenfield plants hire thousands of freshers while the answer to “bonder error E-412 on QFN-48” lives in a veteran’s head. SOPs, travelers, MES/FDC history, e-logbooks and per-serial tool docs become grounded answers — every one cited, or it abstains.
Capabilities
💬Work-instruction Q&A with citations, multilingual🌙Shift-handover drafts from MES/FDC events + e-logbook🔎Deviation assistant: likely causes from similar past NCRs🎓Operator tutor over your procedures, competence gaps tracked
Outcomes
100%answers cited or abstained — zero-hallucination gate
Weeksto deploy, read-first on documents + MES
Downoperator time-to-competence; handover completeness up
ModuleEquipment corpus← absorbs Equipment Docs AI
The same cite-or-abstain corpus, extended to the equipment estate: the versioned, permissioned document-of-record per tool model and serial — manuals, E6 specs, S2 dossiers, FAT/SAT records. It stays the citable spine that Field Service, Assembly and Commissioning read.
🗂️Per-serial document-of-record spine — linked and versioned🔀Semantic revision diffs: what changed, who it touches📤Structured SEMI E6 / S2 exports to fabs
15+ min → secper engineering search on tool docs
≥90%retrieval-precision gate — one gate, both corpora
Also integratesPLM (Teamcenter/Windchill)SEMI E6
Stays the spine Field Service, Assembly & Commissioning cite
Every lot, every tool, every shift — one live operating picture.
For COOs, VPs Manufacturing and fab & OSAT operations leadership.
Monday 08:00
WIP and OEE live per tool and shift, excursions ranked in dollars — a costed action minutes after every shock.
A fab operations command center over your MES and FDC estate: live WIP with predicted cycle times, OEE accounting, an excursion feed ranked by value-at-risk, and a scenario twin for the what-ifs. Read-first — every write passes a named-human gate.
Capabilities
📍Live WIP with ML cycle-time ETAs per route📊OEE & tool-state accounting — one state language🚨Every disruption scored in currency-at-risk, owner assigned🌪️Scenario twin: shocks re-planned with costed deltas✅Gated dispatch writes — one audited MES field
A yield excursion is a seven-figure event — one 2019 excursion scrapped $550M of wafers in a quarter. Wafer-map perception feeds a self-building genealogy graph; agentic RCA runs cross-stage over MES, FDC and STDF — ranked hypotheses, every claim cited.
Capabilities
🧬Genealogy graph built automatically — compounds with every lot🕵️Agentic RCA: ranked hypotheses with evidence trails💸Excursion feed with scrap-at-risk in dollars🚦Gated lot disposition — the only MES write, audited💬Ask it: “why did bin-7 spike?” · “draft the 8D”
Outcomes
Days → hourstime-to-root-cause on excursions
$100k–$10M+per-excursion exposure addressed
100%claims evidence-cited
90 daystypical deployment
ModeWafer-map + adaptive-test← absorbs Inspection AI
The perception layer that feeds the genealogy graph — and a cheap entry tier: a CNN names every wafer-map signature (edge ring, scratch, donut) on arrival, and DPPM-guarded adaptive test-time reduction attacks the OSAT’s #1 margin lever, MES-write-free.
🧠Wafer-map CNN signatures classified on arrival — the perception layer⏬Adaptive test-time reduction, DPPM-guarded📊Sort + final-test (STDF) analytics into the genealogy graph🔗Excursion linkage to tool & recipe
On arrivalsignatures named before a human opens the lot
OSAT margins run ~15–25% against foundry ~50%, yet thousands of package × test combinations are scheduled on Excel. A CP-SAT solver keeps a live horizon schedule; a sub-second dispatcher recommends the next lot. The planner approves; MES stays the record.
Capabilities
🧮CP-SAT horizon solve on every WIP or tool event⚡Sub-second next-lot-on-tool dispatch🔥Hot-lot handling with ripple-cost analysis🛡️Hard guards: MSL clocks, due dates, tool capability🤚Honest abstains on stale live state
Calendar-based PM guards tools worth $5M–$380M each. FDC and sensor streams feed anomaly detection and remaining-useful-life estimates per failure mode — every alert an explicit economic decision, with the work order gated into SAP-PM.
Capabilities
📡Anomaly + RUL per critical subsystem, failure mode named⚖️Explicit economics: run-to-failure vs planned swap📝Predictive work orders gated into SAP-PM/CMMS🧰Technician copilot — never invents a torque spec
Outcomes
−30–50%unplanned downtime (industry benchmark)
$5M–$380Mtool value idled per stockout — the stake
The full tool lifecycle — build, quote, install, service, resupply, trade.
For equipment OEM manufacturing, quoting, service, aftermarket and install leaders — fab equipment engineering, and the legacy-tool secondary market.
Monday 08:00
Fleet uptime vs the SLA floor, build promises vs factory reality, leakage found — every number drills to a ticket, PO or serial.
equipment ai · build → install → service → resupply
Services run 22–35% of revenue at OEMs on tribal knowledge. Every ticket is triaged for remote resolution before a truck rolls; engineers get page-cited troubleshooting — plus an offline Engineer / 2 a.m. mode for legacy tools the OEM abandoned; every event is audited against entitlements.
Capabilities
🛰️Remote-first triage before the flight is booked📖Page-cited troubleshooting from manuals + closed tickets🧳Dispatch prep: right skill, right parts kit🧾Entitlement audit: free work and warranty misuse flagged
Outcomes
+50%first-contact resolution (industry benchmark)
30 min → <1 mintroubleshooting time per incident
~1 in 3tickets remotely resolvable — rolled anyway today
Per resolutionbilling — our revenue is your deflection rate
ModeEngineer / 2 a.m.Runner-ready← absorbs Engineer AI
Troubleshooting for legacy tools the OEM abandoned: speak or photograph the symptom at the tool — offline — and get ranked fix cards cited to the page (the 1998 manual, this serial’s last three fixes). Runs on the shipped EquipAI substrate.
🎙️Voice/photo symptom intake — offline-capable at the tool📖Ranked fix cards, page-cited to scanned manuals + this serial’s history🗄️Legacy / OEM-abandoned-tool corpus, scanned pre-2005 manuals OCR’d🔄Per-tenant knowledge flywheel: a veteran’s fix captured, curated, re-cited — never pooled🧩Discontinued-part answers: alternates, repair or new-manufacture, priced (hands to Sales AI)🧾Refurb-warranty entitlement leakage flagged, billable line drafted💵Per-verified-fix billing — a fix-verification gate meters revenue
symptom → <60 svoice/photo intake to a page-cited fix card
Per-tenantknowledge corpus, never pooled — your veterans stay your moat
Remote health, predictive maintenance and a per-serial digital twin for the installed base. Five connectivity tiers feed drift baselines and RUL models; anomalies arrive as one approvable package. Raw telemetry never leaves the fab’s data boundary.
Capabilities
🪜Five-tier connectivity: SECS/GEM → retrofit IoT📊SEMI E10/E79 state & OEE per serial📦Anomaly → cause, parts kit, dispatch, SLA — one approval object👥Per-serial twin + drift clustering across the fleet💬Fleet Q&A with citations
Outcomes
−30–50%unplanned downtime (industry benchmark)
+20–40%machine life
3–4 hoursunplanned downtime saved per planned hour
0competing installed-base twins for sale (verified Jul 2026)
First-pass yield on complex tool assemblies runs 85–90% — rework on machines priced $5M–$380M, while new-site ramps repeat the veterans’ apprenticeship. The traveler for a serial + configuration becomes interactive, cited, vision-verified steps at the clean bench.
Capabilities
🗂️Step cards per serial + config: action, spec values, citation chip👁️Vision step-verify: fasteners, orientation, FOD, weld class🚧Two-tap deviation → NCR draft + SME escalation🔄BKM flywheel: floor fixes curated into the corpus🧵Serial Build Record feeds FAT baselines and the tool twin
Outcomes
+2–5 ptsfirst-pass yield from the 85–90% baseline, measured
−30–50%time-to-solo for new technicians
100%steps cited — ships only after a ≥90% retrieval gate
Semi³ schedules the fab — Tool Build AI schedules the people who build the tools. CP-SAT finite-capacity scheduling of engineer-to-order builds across clean bays, test stands and skill-certified crews, headless on your SAP: the solver proposes, the master scheduler publishes.
Capabilities
🧮CP-SAT master schedule over bays × test stands × crew skills🎟️Build-slot promising: capable-to-promise ship dates, confidence-banded🚨Recovery re-plans on a part or bay slip, ranked by promise-date delta🛂Crew certification + export clearance as hard solver constraints📊Test-floor OEE analytics on 5-tier retrofit sensing
Outcomes
+2–5 ptsbay/test-stand OEE from the ~65–75% baseline (est.)
$5M–380Mthe shipment a recovered bay-week pulls forward
Every configured-tool quote is an engineering exercise run from experts’ heads — and in a supercycle, quote latency is lost share. A CP-SAT rulebase decides validity, a deterministic engine prices the quote-to-BOM; the LLM drafts the narrative, never the numbers.
Capabilities
🧩Option-compatibility rulebase — verdicts cited to the violated rule🧾Quote-to-BOM integrity: valid config → priced BOM + margin/lead-time roll-up🛂Export/ECCN pre-check per destination — calls Compliance AI, never rebuilds it🎯Retrofit Radar: upgrade campaigns targeted by serial, not broadcast🔁An ECO ripple invalidates affected open quotes automatically
Outcomes
Weeks → daysquote latency on complex configurations (est.)
21–78xinstall-stage cost of the config errors this prevents
A fab installs ~1,200 tools from 100+ vendors; hook-up alone runs $200–500k per tool. Every order becomes one live thread — build → FAT → ship → hook-up → SAT → SL1–SL3 — with slip propagation and self-assembling dossiers.
Capabilities
🧵One live thread from clean-bay build to SL sign-off⏱️Slip propagation with ranked recovery options🛂Crew booking on skills + export-control constraints📚SL1–SL3 / SEMI S2 dossiers assemble themselves
Outcomes
≈ $12–16Mvalue of one avoided slip week (est.)
21–78xcost of an install-stage error vs design stage
Service-parts demand is intermittent and install-base-driven — the canonical hard forecasting problem, run today on ERP min/max. Forecasts come from fleet age, utilization and PM waves; the whole echelon is optimized with SLA penalties priced in. Planners approve every change.
Capabilities
📈Intermittent-demand models + install-base covariates🏭Multi-echelon CP-SAT: DC → depot → consigned stock📦Last-time-buy planner from EOL/PCN notices🧾ROI ledger: baseline, then measure
Outcomes
10–20%inventory freed at equal-or-better SLA (est.)
−30% / ~$700Minventory / EBIT anchor case (aircraft OEM)
1.3–1.6xaftermarket turns today — the baseline to beat
Agentic sales for used, refurbished and legacy tools, where every serial is the SKU: the per-serial asset graph — configuration, attested condition grade, provenance, jurisdiction — drives export-screened quotes, refurb-delta CPQ and flash-matched trades. Rides the shipped SalesI substrate.
Capabilities
🏷️Asset Book: the trading book as a live per-serial database📨Messy forwarded RFQ → complete three-option quote, export-screened🧮Refurb-delta CPQ: as-found → target spec solved and priced — LLM never numbers⚖️Used-tool export rules encoded and cited; book re-screened on a rule change⚡Trading desk: decommission lots flash-matched to waiting buyers
A $5M–380M tool changes hands and the buyer asks a simple question: what is actually inside this one? Not the model — this serial. Which parts were replaced, from which lots; which tests and calibrations it passed; who signed for the condition. That record usually exists as tribal memory across three systems. Here it is a single frozen, signed document per serial, and the export refuses to produce it when the evidence is not there.
Capabilities
🧩Parts replaced, carried by lot and serial🧪Tests & calibrations carried by reference, not retyped✍️A named human attests the condition grade🔒Frozen and signed at sign-off; export blocks on an uncited claim
Outcomes
4 refusalsexport stops on missing twin, unattested grade, uncited claim or thin evidence
Per serialone as-built record per tool, never per model
Named attesterevery condition grade carries a person, not a system
IntegratesTool twinBuild ordersTest & cal spineERP serial master
Every service organisation wants to know whether it is actually good, and none of them will hand over raw numbers to find out. The usual answer is an industry survey a year out of date. This is the other answer: consent-gated cohorts on a small set of ratios, where membership is opt-in per cohort and a figure is published only once the cohort is large enough that no member can be reverse-engineered out of it. The guard is code, not policy — the system refuses to return a cohort minimum or maximum, because those are attributable.
Capabilities
🤝Consent-gated membership, chosen per cohort and revocable🔢Four ratios: first-dispatch accuracy, downtime, first-pass yield, schedule slip🛡️k-anonymity floor written onto every publication🚫Refuses cohort min/max — the non-attributability guard
Outcomes
k ≥ 5minimum cohort before any figure publishes
4 ratiospersisted, audited and replayable — not a survey
Opt-inconsent per cohort, withdrawable at any time
IntegratesDispatch historyTool twinQuality spineERP service orders
Multi-tier visibility and control, from capex tools to die banks.
For CPOs, VPs Supply Chain, logistics and materials leaders.
Monday 08:00
A ranked decision feed — exposures, predicted slips, costed mitigations; event to approved action in minutes, not weeks.
supply chain ai · every tier on one circuit
Your ERP records the buy; nothing tells you the fair price. Semiconductor-native sourcing intelligence for the $0.5–3B tool program and nine hyper-concentrated commodity categories: should-cost on every quote, PO slips predicted early — cited, gated, read-first on SAP.
Capabilities
🔧Capex & tool sourcing: slots, refurbs, service benchmarks🕵️AI expediter: commits parsed, slips predicted, chased in policy📡Nine commodity packs with driver-backed buy timing🧮Should-cost models + index-linked counter-proposals
Qualifying a second source takes 6–18 months — in categories like ABF film with one effective source. Discovery, JEDEC/AEC-Q qualification projects and risk monitoring run as durable agents, so the second source exists before the crunch.
Capabilities
🔎Semantic discovery across registries, customs, certifications📋Qualification-project agent: plans, chases, scores readiness⚠️Single-source register, concentration risk per category🤝Supplier-360: quals in flight, scorecards, field alerts
Outcomes
−30–50%qualification cycle time, from the 6–18-month norm
Rankedsingle-source chokepoints, by exposure
~90% / 5wafer supply held by five suppliers — the why
Where should the buffer live — wafer bank, die bank or finished goods? Solved stochastically across echelons and forms, MSL and shelf-life clocks automated per lot. When supply tightens: bank die now, finish to order — gated.
Capabilities
🏦Wafer vs die vs finished goods — solved, not guessed⏲️MSL floor-time & shelf-life clocks per lot, enforced📈Honest intermittent-demand forecasts for materials🌊Shortage-mode buffer-form recommendations, gated
An entire fab arrives through customs — one missing annexure parks an etch cluster in bond. Import files assemble ICEGATE-ready, SEZ/bonded/AEO scheme logic applied, delay risk tracked per tool. The agent prepares; your licensed broker files.
Capabilities
🛃ICEGATE-ready tool-import files per shipment🏝️SEZ / bonded / AEO scheme logic across the program⏱️ETA + delay risk per tool vs install milestones🚢Multi-tier orchestration — prepare, never auto-file
Data incumbents describe parts; this acts on your BOM: price and lead-time foresight with regime detection, a live risk register per line, form-fit-function alternates always flagged “requires qualification”, counterfeit screening before any gated shortage buy.
Capabilities
📈Price & lead-time forecasts with honest data-density states⚠️BOM risk register: single-source, lifecycle, allocation🔁FFF alternates — requires-qual flagged, always🕵️Counterfeit & seller-trust screening, recall-biased🤖Agentic shortage buying within a ceiling
Every other product on this page faces a fab, an OSAT or a tool maker. This one faces the distributor — the tier that moves parts between them and thousands of smaller buyers, and that runs today on spreadsheets and a shared inbox. Moisture-sensitive parts carry a floor-life clock that most systems lose at the first hop; certificates of analysis arrive as PDFs in a folder. Here the lot is the unit of record: MSL level and floor-life hours travel with it, its CoA stays in custody receipt-to-shipment, and the quote desk cannot price what it cannot certify.
Capabilities
🌡️MSL-aware catalog: J-STD-033 level + floor-life clock per lot📜Per-lot CoA custody, receipt through shipment💬RFQ → quote → order desk with margin guardrails🔁VMI & consignment replenishment on the customer’s own signal
Outcomes
Floor-life intactthe MSL clock survives every hop, receipt to ship
Per-lotcertificate custody, not a folder of PDFs
k ≥ 5disclosure floor on every public aggregate
ModePublic AVL discovery
An open approved-vendor-list surface with an honest verification ladder — research-listed → claimed → verified — so a listing never implies more than it has earned. Suppliers claim and upgrade their own profile; aggregates publish only above a k-anonymity floor.
IntegratesERPWMSSupplier CoA feedsCustomer RFQ / EDI
From wafer-map signal to closed 8D — quality that closes the loop.
For VPs Quality & Reliability, compliance officers and customer-quality teams.
Monday 08:00
Wafer-map signatures classified overnight, 8Ds drafted and cited, the weekend’s RMAs traced to their wafer lots.
A customer escape costs days of your scarcest engineers — under sub-PPM automotive expectations. 8D, CAPA and PPAP packs are drafted straight from the root-cause evidence trail; containment-to-closure runs on state machines. Cite-or-abstain, named approvals.
Capabilities
📝8D / PPAP / CAPA drafted from evidence — engineers approve🔒Containment-to-closure state machines, AEC-Q discipline🔗Supplier-quality loop onto the scorecard✅Named approval gate on every customer release
Outcomes
Days → hours8D / PPAP authoring on escapes
100%claims evidence-cited in every pack
Sub-PPM / AEC-Qthe discipline the state machines enforce
Takes a returned unit from RMA intake back through genealogy to its wafer, lot, tool and recipe; drives the FA-lab queue; classifies the mechanism; decides the highest-net-recovery disposition — and catches the epidemic cluster before it becomes a recall.
Capabilities
🧬Field→wafer genealogy trace on the Yield AI graph — deterministic🔬FA-lab workflow: decap → X-ray → SEM queue, committed ETAs🏷️Failure-mechanism classification, cite-or-abstain — never a guessed label⚖️Net-recovery disposition: re-screen · replace · credit · RTV · scrap🚨Epidemic detector + gated stop-ship, precision-biased
Outcomes
−25–40%FA cycle time — the metric your customer scores you on
≥90%genealogy epidemics caught; ≤1 false stop-ship per quarter
Aggregates field-failure populations — FA results, burn-in escapes, customer DPPM trends — into calibrated FIT/Weibull models per device, package and lot-window; catches drift against the qualified AEC-Q/JEDEC baseline; routes each learning to its lever: design, process, screen or derating.
Capabilities
📈Deterministic FIT/DPPM/Weibull/Arrhenius fitting, confidence-bounded🚨Drift detection vs qualified JEDEC/AEC-Q envelopes🧭Mechanism→lever mapping: ECN, process window, screen, derating — cited🎓Model diplomas: refuted by field data → revoked, cannot route until re-qualified📒Realized FIT/DPPM gains ledgered per lot-window
The most trade-regulated goods on earth — entity lists +42 then +23 within a year. Classification is retrieval-first and cited; the order book re-screens the day a rule changes; declaration chases run as durable campaigns. Prepare, never auto-file.
Capabilities
📜Cited ECCN/HTS classification — abstains when ambiguous🔁Rule-change replay re-screens the affected order book🚫Denied-party & license-path screening, drafted per order📮Agentic declaration chase: RoHS, REACH, PFAS, 3TG🌱Grounded BRSR/CSRD/CDP drafting — every figure cited
Outcomes
Same dayorder-book re-screen after a rule change
100%determinations cited to the governing text
0auto-filings — always prepare, never file
100%drafted report figures grounded
IntegratesSAP SD order bookBIS/Federal Register feedsDGFT/SCOMETSupplier declaration portals
The CFO’s decision layer: cost it, collect it, commit it, prove it.
For CFOs, chief supply chain officers, revenue controllers, cost accountants and FP&A leaders.
Monday 08:00
Cost-per-good-die reconciled to Friday’s close, take-or-pay re-valued, every debit adjudicated to its cited clause.
Rolls every lot’s actual cost up from the floor — material, consumables, tool-time — yield-adjusted to cost-per-good-die, NRE amortized, take-or-pay loaded. Variance decomposes as a waterfall that sums exactly; margin by product and customer, live. SAP CO stays the record.
Capabilities
🧮Deterministic cost roll to wafer/die/unit/lot — DECIMAL, never a float🎯Yield-adjusted cost-per-good-die, provenance cited to the yield record📉Plan→actual waterfall: which tool, consumable, yield loss or test-time creep📊Margin-by-product/customer roll-up, tied to the GL🏛️ISM/PLI incentive tracker: committed → claimed → realized
Outcomes
±2–3%lot-level reconciliation to SAP CO period-close (ship gate)
4–7%of gross profit at stake per 1% costing error at 15–25% margins
+0.5–2 ptsmargin recovered on the piloted line (est. range)
0journal postings — the controller acts in SAP CO
IntegratesSAP CO/FI/MM (read-first)MES/FDCYield AICapacity AI exposure
Validates every invoice against its cited contract terms and runs the semiconductor claims stack — ship-and-debit, price protection, rebates, POS, consignment, OTIF/LD penalties. The Promise Ledger turns a broken promise into an adjudicated penalty, fab evidence chain attached.
Capabilities
🧾Invoice-accuracy validation against cited contract clauses🧮Six claim lanes, deterministic entitlement math: valid · short-pay · reject · counter📬Penalty adjudication on the chain: lot → promise → miss → LD clause → penalty💳Cash application: statement↔invoice matching, idempotent — no double-apply📊Collections prioritized by calibrated risk
Outcomes
4–7%of gross profit lost per point of claims leakage — the stake
≥95%straight-through cash auto-match; zero double-application
100%penalty adjudications carry the fab evidence chain
0GL postings — SAP FI posts, the payment rail moves the money
IntegratesSAP FI/SD (read-first)Delivery AI Promise LedgerDistributor POS/EDIPayment rail
Nobody decides what to book — planning takes allocation as a given. Booked wafer, packaging and memory capacity becomes a portfolio of contracts and options: take-or-pay exposure projected into P&L, draw reconciled, ranked book/hold/release calls. You book; it never writes.
Capabilities
🧾Take-or-pay / LTA exposure projected at every cliff, clause-cited🔄Committed-vs-actual draw reconciliation — 100% tie-out🎟️Real-options valuation of booked slots: hold, exercise, abandon, transfer🧩Co-book coverage: wafer ↔ CoWoS ↔ HBM gaps flagged before the cliff💰Prepayment & wafer-agreement tracking, milestone by milestone
Outcomes
52–156 wksbooking horizon under management — CoWoS 52–78; 2nm into 2028
$5–20Bthe commitment lumps a book/hold/release call moves
100%co-book coverage gaps flagged before the take-or-pay cliff
0writes — the CFO/CSCO books in your own contract system
IntegratesSAP (read-first)Foundry/OSAT booking portalsPlanning AI draw feedMarket Intel AI
The referee, not a player: every recommendation tracked through identified → accepted → implemented → realized — flipping only on a matched ERP signal, a PO actually paid, credited against the would-have-happened counterfactual. Modelled and realized never blur.
Capabilities
🔀Fan-in: subscribes to every product’s recommendation events🔎Downstream-signal matching: PO paid, fee avoided, credit posted, buffer drawn⚖️Counterfactual attribution — credit only the delta over the baseline⏳Decay detection: modelled-but-not-realized flagged, routed back to its owner📊The week-8 pilot scorecard: measured value, or you walk
Outcomes
≥95%realization-match precision — a false “realized” is a lie to the CFO
±25%attribution credit vs finance’s adjudicated counterfactual
~95%of GenAI pilots show no P&L impact (MIT NANDA) — the fact this defeats
0ERP/GL writes — realized flips only on a matched fact
IntegratesSAP FI/CO/MM/SD (read-first)Every Semi3 suiteDemoForgi twin ledgerExecutive AI
The decisions layer: plan it, promise it, see it — live.
For CEOs, CFOs, S&OP and customer-operations leaders.
Monday 08:00
One live picture — promises re-verified, allocations defensible, every KPI wearing an evidence badge.
Not another chart wall — a ranked feed of decisions worth money. The cross-suite spine becomes a CEO cockpit: recommendations ranked by value-at-risk × evidence, KPI tiles carrying evidence badges, a narrated “what changed this week” drilling to source records.
Capabilities
🎯Ranked decision board: currency impact, evidence badge, owner🏷️KPI tiles with provenance — every number drills down🗞️Narrated weekly change feed across all seven suites🧾Approval audit trail with the exact payload shown
Outcomes
Weeks → hoursexecutive decision latency
100%numbers provenance-linked to a source record
Strong / weakevidence badges on every claim — never a confidence %
Planning in 2026 means co-booking wafer starts, CoWoS and HBM as one constraint — CoWoS booked out 52–78 weeks, HBM sold out. Demand and supply modeled against the real constraint set; shocks get costed scenarios in hours, not war rooms.
Capabilities
🧩Wafer + CoWoS + HBM co-booked as one constraint🌪️Scenario twin: “lose 20% substrate” answered with costed options📅Demand/supply planning against allocated capacity🔄Event-driven re-planning, feeding Delivery AI’s promises
Order management runs over EDI and RosettaNet with SAP SD as the record — nothing reasons about it. Exceptions triaged across thousands of lines, promise dates served by Delivery AI’s ATP engine, fair-share administered with audited rationale. Every write passes a named gate.
Capabilities
📥EDI/RosettaNet exception triage with costed resolutions📆Promise dates via Delivery AI’s ATP/CTP engine — calls it, never re-implements⚖️Fair-share allocation with a defensible rationale🔁RMA triage + ship-and-debit anomaly detection
Outcomes
−40–60%exception-handling time target
0allocation audit gaps
Via Delivery AIATP/CTP promises — called, never re-implemented
A fab is a promise machine — it commits good die it hasn’t yielded yet. Four checks per promise — Available, Capable, Yielded, Profitable — logged to a Promise Ledger. It never bluffs: low confidence routes to a human.
Capabilities
✅Four checks at order entry: die bank, schedule, yield, margin📒Promise Ledger: misses auto-tune future buffers🎚️Calibrated gating: auto-confirm high, route low to a human🕶️Shadow-mode calibration before customers see a promise
Outcomes
OTIF ↑promises kept, measured on your own ledger
0silent slips — tracked to closure or escalated
Shadow-firstcalibrated before any customer sees a promise
Every product on this page can be rehearsed in the Digital Twin Lab, powered by DemoForgi — golden scenarios in shadow mode on a synthetic twin of your enterprise, before anything touches production.